Friday, April 2, 2010

The Art of Relationships, Part II - love and infidelity - never the 'twain shall meet


Is there such a thing as true love? Or is it all in our minds?

Seems the answer is yes to both. And since the only true reality exists in our minds (a teasing intro to a future blog), it's 'yes' to the former, because it's 'yes' to the latter.

World leading anthropologists like Helen Fisher and William Janowiak (among others) have discovered a physiological (not cultural) basis to romantic love.

They found out that certain parts of the brain releases dopamines when people who claim to be 'in love' thought about their partners, triggering a release of 'good vibrations'. (If only I could figure out how to bottle such a delectable drug, I could quit my day job and put all my kids through college).

But from the little reading I have done so far, (don't worry, there's more to come down the road), it's quite consuming. So much so, that some anthropologists are suggesting we are emotionally monogamous.

Some people can handle being in more than one sexual relationship (though I'm not one of them), but not emotionally (ie; not romantically).

Every woman interviewed in the polyandrous societies of the High Himalyans claimed their lives were "emotionally challenging" because they had more than one husband - note: not consort - and as a result, preferred a monogamous relationship.

Making sure someone is emotionally satisfied takes way more energy than satisfying them sexually. After a while, if you've been doing it right all along, chances are it will become more effortless - you get to know them, they get to know you, you figure each other out, blah blah blah... but seriously. Three husbands?

Please kill me.

There are enough neurological differences between men and women as it is, never mind all those other factors like environment, personality, genes, to think that you can spread it around to a few lovers and make them all feel "special".

Love is a powerful feeling and you really can't be in love with more than one person at a time. Lust? Mabye. Love? No. Love... real love, is monogamous. And as Fisher says, 'it's something we're willing to die for.'

The question is, what is real love?

So my friend Jim asked me a couple of questions today that I would like to answer here based somewhat on the information I have begun to pull together on the nature of love:

"Could you forgive infidelity? Should Tiger's wife forgive him?"

After all, Tiger didn't love those women, he lusted after them.

According to the research, every society in the world distinguises between the two. And every society has difficulty reconciling them.

Here's what I think... straight from my email response...

infidelity....

a one night stand, yeah, i could probably forgive that, though it speaks to trust and i'd be wondering if they'd ever do it again... so that might turn into a problem on its own... a relationship is suppose to be based on trust and if that's gone, you're fucked. but it's possible to get over that if there's remorse and there were extenuating circumstances, like lots of alcohol, immaturity.... but yeah, i think so....

a string of one night stands? less likely - because it speaks to habit and i'd be putting myself at risk for a number of things, including one of those one night stands turning into an affair, or my 'husband' bringing home a disease...

as for an affair of the heart?

never.

it's the one thing about romantic love helen fisher talks about that had the most impact on me. human beings are emotionally (ie; romantically) monogamous by nature. even swingers, who agree to an open marriage, do so only providing the other person comes home to 'them'.... their heart belongs to one. that's why people are willing to die over love (the romantic kind), but would never put their lives on the line for a woman they screw.

or a woman for a gigollo for that matter.

sex is sex, (and can be forgiven - it won't be easy or pretty, but it's possible) but the real deal is a sacred thing and as such it must be honored.

as for tiger woods?

unforgiveable.

because he's too immature to know what he did. and he gave these women his time and energy and flew them around... things he should have been doing with his wife. he was half screwing them, half courting them. he was playing the game of love, even if he had no plans to follow through... that's a slap in the face to the wife, coming from a confused man who has not earned the privilege of the benefits love entails.

and he was feeding off of all of it for the purposes of his own ego.

tiger has no idea what love is, no concept whatsoever.... at least not right now. he's too young, too immature. and one mistake gone public cannot fix that.

she'd be crazy to take him back.

but, i'll give him the benefit of the doubt and say he loved his wife as best he could (which isn't saying much).... the thing is... everyone wants to think they love.... and people genuinely DO. they love to their fullest capacity and can love no more. (and for most people, this is limited).

now that doesn't mean they're bad people, it just means that their capacity to love might be less (or different) than it is for other people. here's an example....

i dated a guy - mike in chicago - he was absolutely crazy about me (claimed to be). i was the love of his life, blah blah blah.... (supposedly and i believed him)...

but his idea of 'love' had limits and that's why i couldn't be with him any more. and when he told me again (a few years after we broke up) that i was his "one and only" and how he "dreamed of coming to canada and showing up at my door and sweeping me off my feet" so we could be together again....

"well.... dude", i thought, ".... then just do it".

please be the ultimate NIKE commercial. and just frakkin' do it!

but...

when a man backs up that statement with...."but i don't have a passport to get across the border"... it doesn't mean all that much anymore when all that would take is applying for one.

it's not that mike didn't love me. he simply loved me as much as he could. which is fine. but let's face it. he's talking to a woman who moved to another country for love (me) and would do it again. and before that little fiasco, i stuck it out in an awful marriage for a long time, because i understood that you don't just leave. and believe me, i had reason to.

i would walk over hot coals for the right guy. i know that about myself. but this time, he's gotta be worth it. and he's gotta earn it. cuz i'm good for it. and i'm not taking any less.

so sometimes, i think the ability to love takes someone who has experienced great suffering so they know how precious it is.... and how lucky they are to have found it.

tiger doesn't get that. and neither do most people.

he doesn't understand how fortunate he was because he never had to sacrifice anything to get it. nor did he suffer to find her. nor do i think he had to work for it all that hard (or even at all)... tiger never earned it.


-----

If true love exists - and apparently it does in the minds (literally) of all of us... then those people who are lucky enough to find it (more on that later), are hopefully smart enough to hang on to it.

-----

Next: reconciling love and lust....

Tuesday, March 30, 2010

The Art of not being a control freak - relationships, Part I


I started dating someone.

There. I've said it. I used the "d" word.

It's been grand, though I can't admit, entirely easy. Through the 'still new' course of this boy-meets-girl-and-they're-hanging-out adventure (see, I still can't use the "d" word), I have discovered a few very interesting things about myself.

The least pleasant of which is, I am a control freak.

I am still hard pressed to admit it because frankly, I'm okay with being a control freak providing I don't suck anyone else into the vortex of my control.

I think it's okay to try and have control over your life (even though we all know that never works out the way we think either) but to expect anyone else to fall into place is just plain unreasonable.

They're too busy trying to control their own life, their way.

And I don't know why it always suprises me when I realize for the gazillionth time that every one else's reality revolves around them and not me. But it's true.

That's why when people ask me, "but what are people going to THINK"? (in reference to their dirty laundry - or mine - being exposed), I say:

"Nothing. Because nobody really cares about your life (except your friends, and even then...) The rest are too busy trying to figure out their own lives to worry about yours. And even if they do, it's temporary cuz everybody's wrapped up in their own drama."

So what does it matter what people think?

But maybe the best answer I heard came from David Foster. When asked in an interview:

"You've been so successful, why do you want people like me, asking all these personal questions about your life?" (this followed a discussion about his former, disastrous reality show which the interviewer thought might be a huge source of embarassment for Foster).

Foster answered:

"Because I don't care. Do you know how long you're on this earth? (snaps his fingers) That long. You're here for 80 years or 73 point something and you're dead for trillions of years. Trillions. So does it matter?"

No David, it doesn't. And neither does the fact that I'm trying to control every aspect of my life and I can't. Sometimes, you just have to let things go and let them play out on their own.

'Cause before you know it, it's going to be over. How much time of that 'snap!' do you really want to spend freaking out?

Things will work out the way they're suppose to. In the meantime, I just have to be the best person I can. Since I can't control anyone else's reaction except my own, that's where I have to start.

I came into this 'connection' having established some pre-conceived notions of how it was suppose to be. I had been treated dismissively so consistently in previous relationships, that I was now looking for signs of a laissez-faire behaviour which could only mean one thing - he could "take-it-or-leave-it". In other words, I didn't mean squat either way.

And if that was the case, I was done. I was crispy I was so done. Matter of fact, I couldn't wait to be done because I was getting tired of waiting for the axe to fall. So why not just find something wrong and get it over with? Seemed logical to me.

At least that way, I'd be the one in control.

So when things weren't playing out the way I had imagined they should, but more casually (the irony being that's the way I had set it up in the first place because I wasn't ready for anything that resembled a dating label), I was pissed off. Okay, irate is more like it.

Hypocrite that I am.

But oh, so busted.

Sure, there were other things I actually did have the right to be ticked about...

I like someone to make plans with me way ahead of time because my days are usually full, I like punctuality, lots of communication when it comes to tardiness and a man to do a bit more of the chasing while I get to play 'coy', but generally speaking I freaked out not because any of those expectations were violated, but because I didn't know how to handle my new feelings.

I was back in Junior High.

I was feeling more vulnerable than I had in years and I didn't know what to do with it. And I needed a big neon sign to come out of the sky and tell me if my feelings were reciprocated.

I wanted a guarantee that this was equal. Even Steven. A shared feeling right down the line. Tit for tat.

If I was going to feel raw and be vulnerable, then I bloody well better not be the only one. And when I realized I couldn't be sure, (and furthermore had no right to ask because I had made it perfectly clear I was a committaphobe), I put up the Berlin wall of defense strategies and turned into a someone I suddenly didn't like very much. Or as he put it:

"Man, you are mean when you're angry."

To which I replied, "No I'm not. Only with you."

Because this relationship (and I can't believe I am calling it that) has become a trigger.

I realized that no matter how much work I have done on myself to understand my failings, my behavior, the reason I attracted the wrong men into my life, there's nothing quite like putting what I think I know into practice.

You can't truly say you've broken the negative patterns in all your previous relationships by living in a vacuum. You have to BE in one.

In other words, you can't do it alone. Theory is one thing, intellectualizing the process is one thing, but feeling your way through it, is quite another.

So...

Even though I'm still not labelling anything, and even though I'm not crazy about plowing through some very uncomfortable feelings, I realize that it's time I stopped being a control freak, stopped running away and just DEAL WITH THIS.

And sabottaging what might actually be good for me? That's no longer an option. (Although I can't promise I won't still try).

And even though I'm not buying new shoes yet, I've only got one toe out the door these days instead of my entire foot.

What I realized also is that everybody express themselves differently.

I can't get someone to like me the way I think they should like me. Even if I did, it wouldn't mean anything. They have to do it the way they need to do it. In their own time, using their own methods. And if that doesn't sit well with me, well... then I can decide if it's enough for me or if I need something else, something more to feel valued and appreciated.

And if that's the case, then I can choose to move on.

But in the meantime, I'm going to learn the art of not being a control freak. I'll do my best to give that other person the benefit of the doubt and not jump to conclusions. Because all things considered, things are pretty darn good.

So, it's time to leave the baggage behind. After all, do you know how long we're on this earth for?

(snap!) That's right. That long.

-----
Next - an anthropologist's view on the nature of love...

Sunday, March 14, 2010

The Art of not being a chickenshit and busting yourself

Okay, so this isn't gonna cut it.

Even I know one blog a month is lame. I mean, like... this is totally lame.

But I've been contemplating cutting out my blog life. And in the interim between self-deprecatory excuses, I have been emailing my friend, mentor, and confidante, "Writer Jim" my best I've-been-to-law-school-so-just-try-and-talk-me-out-of-it-I-dare-you arguments justifying my actions.

Or perhaps, more accurately, lack thereof in the writing department.

Why? Because suddenly, I doubted my ability to post on a consistent, (2-3 times a week) basis. And I don't mean just any old post, but a good post. With life lessons, an open heart, and of course, my life on a platter.

Sometimes that's the toughest part.

It's one thing to lecture about what I know (correction - what I think I know)and quite another to use the blog not only as a venue of personal expression (for that's what a blog is) but as Gestalt therapy.

Gestalt therapy: an existential--experiential form of psychotherapy that emphasizes personal responsibility, and that focuses upon the individual's experience in the present moment, the therapist-client relationship, the environmental and social contexts of a person's life, and the self-regulating adjustments people make as a result of their overall situation.

Y'all are my collective therapist.

You even fit the stereotype - that of a silent listener who takes notes from a fancy leather-studded armchair while I lay on some matching burgundy chaise lounge spilling my guts out and wondering how crazy you think I really am when I leave.

Oy vay.

And yet, I know that some of my experiences simply mirror those of others. So I'm not really operating in a vacuum. The difference is, I put words and analysis to mine. And somewhere along the way, somebody gets what I'm saying.

And that's why I do it. That's why I want to keep doing it.

As I bust myself constantly, there exists a possibility that someone, somewhere might identify their crap with mine. And maybe, just maybe, take note and save themselves a little unnecessary aggravation in the process.

Interestingly enough, it was busting myself that made me come back...

It's not that I couldn't find the time to blog - although I am the queen of legitimate excuses - I couldn't see myself personally delving further (in a no-holds-barred kinda way) into my life anymore without feeling completely and utterly exposed.

But if there's one thing I've never wanted to be in life, it's a chickenshit. And I just busted myself on being one.

So for better or worse, I'm back. Maybe just once a week on Sundays, because I've started another book (more on that later) but I am, indeed back.

Sunday, February 21, 2010

The Art of Letting go - Part II - new beginnings


There I was, 40-something, standing in the middle of my new one bedroom apartment when it finally occurred to me...

For the first time in my life, I was about to live alone.

I felt my eyes brimming over with tears as I took a walk down memory lane and the last 25 years. I was overtaken with emotion.

No more kids to clean up after, no more vats of food to make, or fights to mediate, or tears to wipe or homework to check, (well that's not true - occasionally they still send their essays for feedback), but mostly...

NO MORE BATHROOM TO SHARE.

And you know what that means...

I could finally pee with the door OPEN.

Wahoo!!!

Silly as it sounds, anyone who hasn't tried this yet has no idea how liberating it is. Combined with an exercise that entails walking through your home completely naked serves up an effective recipe designed to remind one what life was like before restrictions. Frakkin' awesome.

Welcome to your potty training mental state.

Yesiree. The perks of living alone were starting to overshadow the awkward silence I was feeling in a space that was for once, COMPLETELY mine.

I had taken living with (and caring) for others so much for granted that I realized it was going to take some time for all of this 'freedom' to sink in.

But as always old habits die hard.

I was still buying food in bulk and making vats of it, just in case any of the boys or their girlfriends dropped by. (And there was always a chance, since everyone lived but a block away).

But that's not the point. I simply wasn't used to it.

It hadn't really dawned on me how foreign this concept of living alone was until I went to bed for the first time. I turned the TV off and there it was...

Silence

No more residual noises leftover from kids socializing until the wee hours of the morning, no more video games playing softly in another room, and no more wondering who will waltz in late from a night out on the town.

It was absolute, total, unequivocal silence.

How the hell am I suppose to sleep in this? I thought.

I know... like this - zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

And just like that, I did.

However, life alone was not all daisies and daffodils.

As I settled into the new life changes I was experiencing, I realized that the trough-sized portions of food I was constantly cooking were less of an altruistic desire to feed my family and perhaps more honestly, a reflection of my own need to keep some semblance of my old life intact (and my other self).

After all, who was I if I wasn't needed?

I wanted to be needed. I wanted to matter.

Most of all, I wanted to count.

And if I didn't do something for someone, then what need would exist for them to come over?

It was such a large part of my modus operandi that I'm not sure I knew who I was without it.

So I cooked. But as the weeks and months passed, I stopped cooking for those other reaons (that I needed to be prepared just in case someone dropped by). I did it because it relaxed me, as it always had after a hectic day at work.

Cooking became its own reward. Especially soup.

So I became The Soupmaker.

Whether someone came by to enjoy the fruits of my loving labors became irrelevant to me. (Even though someone usually did). What was relevant was the feeling I got from doing it.

It always comes down to feelings.

If it feels good, you're doing it for the right reasons (whatever it is you're doing). And if it doesn't feel good, you stop.

It's as simple as that.

As the months wore on, something else occurred to me that shifted my life into new beginnings, changing my perspective once again...

I no longer had a nuclear family.

That realization became one of the turning points in my life. For this one however, I had to learn the art of really letting go.

While I am privileged to receive a phone call from at least one of the boys on a daily basis, for the most part, I was now on the outskirts of their lives.

And I'll never forget when it dawned on me either.

I had just gotten off the phone with one of them, and was told they had all made plans with each other (and girlfriends) over the holidays - dinner at one of their apartments, complete with wine and dessert. Always a big success.

Always?

"It's a tradition we started years ago Mom".

And I was not in the mix.

Oh my GOD, I thought, I'M EXTENDED FAMILY.

All the pieces were starting to fit together.

I realized I was also not the first responder in a crisis. Not that I didn't want to be, I just wasn't necessarily the first one they called when they had a problem - sometimes I was, but often they called each other first.

As it should be.

The shock wore off quickly enough. But as I hung up the phone, I remained standing, hands on my hips, looking at the ground expecting it to open up and an invisible home theatre to slowly emerge as the trailer of "My Life as a Mother" would start playing, melodramatic music n' all, to an audience of one - me.

And the same words rolled around in my head like a broken record...

I'm extended family now. Me. Holy crap. What does that mean?

It meant, it was time to let go.

A strange calm came over me then. I knew that whatever happened, they were going to be alright.

They had each other. And I smiled.

Not only did they have each other, but soon they would develop working relationships with people in their chosen fields and become intangibly connected with some of them as well. (Just as close as family).

I believe that every time you get to know yourself better, (ie; everytime you grow - academically, through a crisis, or creatively), you become better acquainted with who you are and begin to draw from within the circle of your experiences more people with whom you resonate energetically than ever before.

And those are the closest relationships you will ever have. As close as family. They include girlfriends, siblings, lifers, and co-workers.

I have some like that. Now it was their turn.

This was the curve in the road I had never anticipated.

It also became the perfect opportunity for me to do some of the discovering I had put on the backburner all those years ago when raising a family and staying alive had become the only two priorities in my life.

(Self-awareness held a distant fourth, after number three which was trying to pick God's brain in an effort to understand the nature of suffering).

But I smiled that day.

A quiet smile that no one, save me, was privy to. It was a smile that came with a knowing that I was once again presented with a golden opportunity to work on myself and learn some of the things I had always wanted to learn and do - like write a book, go on a trip with friends and learn how to be a Princess.

Maybe even, fall in love. With the right guy this time.

And so once again, the quest began...

Saturday, February 13, 2010

The Art of Letting Go - PART I - hindsight is so yesterday.


I should have written more this week but I find myself completely distracted by the Olympic games.

It happens every time they come on. I can't help it. They move me.

And I revisit how I would have loved to compete in my younger days. (Not now of course, unless I could convince the olympic committee to incorporate something like shuffleboard as an event. Then I might be convinced to train feverishly amid regular breaks of beer and nachos).

Not that I was anywhere near athletic perfection back then mind you - even in my prime (which was probably around fourteen). I wasn't even terribly athletic for that matter. And I could be oh so uncoordinated when attempting new activities.

Unfortunately, I was also fearless to the point of stupidity. (A characteristic my parents dutifully ignored because they figured I would eventually grow out of it.)

Little did they know this stubborness would simply transfer into other aspects of my life. But that is neither here, nor there. (Whatever that means).

But I digress...

In any case, when I was a young lass, a brash restlessness to test the boundaries of my limits overtook my more logical senses on a regular basis, resulting in a few injuries, all sustained before the age of 13; like crushing a couple of vertebrae together in my neck because I fell off a horse going over a fence I wasn't ready for, or flying off a mogul without any clue as to form and getting the tip of one ski practically stuck in my skull.

And of course, I ignored each and every injury, the extent of which I was blissfully ignorant upon receving, and repeated the exercise so as not to end the day on a negative note.

The Gods must have been on my side while no doubt shaking their heads at my complete indifference to the life they gave me. Good thing they had a sense of humour.

I'm still convinced I could have done it all back then.

If only... I had had a little focus.

But at the ripe young age of forty-something, I now know that hindsight is not only 20/20, but it's also so yesterday.

Interestingly enough, I have few regrets. As one athlete quipped earlier today, "everyone has their path, this was mine", (or something to that effect).

Being an olympic athlete was simply not part of mine.

Shoulda, woulda, coulda.

Dreamers beware.

Shoulda, woulda coulda are three dirty little words, that when accompanied by the infamous 'if only' become a sour recipe for regret and its ensuing disease hindsightitis.

These are our worst enemies in the art of letting go. They hold us back from truly experiencing the wonders of life in the here and now.

I had other things to conquer in life, things to beat on a personal nature that can't be timed on a clock or gauged by a medal. As do most people.

And I still have many things to do that are as exciting to me as practicing for the olympics would be for a world-class athlete.

It's all relative.

Life is relative.

It's all about being good with where you are and what you're doing.

Accpeting the choices you've made (or forgiving yourself for some) as well accepting things for which you had no control but that affected your life anyway - whether you agreed to them or not... whether you like them or not...

And then there are choices you embark upon to make the necessary changes in your life that take you out of the comfort zone you've been used to - sometimes for the last twenty-five years.

But don't worry, Darwin was right. We're pretty good at evolving to accomodate our newer circumstances - bigger and better than ever.

Accepting, letting go, changing, living for the moment, and looking to the future with an open heart and mind.

That's the key.

These are all things you must do to keep from contracting 'hindsightitis' or 'regrettaphobia' and other unnamed diseases of the heart and mind that prevent you from living fully and enjoying every stage of your life for what it offers you in the form of love and learning.

So as I watch the olympic games and feel the adrenaline pound in my chest for every athlete whose hard work, heart ache, sacrifice and last minute injuries add to the drama and celebration of my own life, I am grateful, not regretful.

Grateful they exist to remind me of the joy of following your passion. Grateful to share in their experience and energy, because their courage only adds to my own.

Next - Part II...